Thanks for the reply.
Is there any date or a plan when this feature will be released?
Search found 3 matches
- Mon 25. Sep 2017, 13:22
- Forum: PCAN-UDS
- Topic: J1939 Address Claim
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4354
- Mon 25. Sep 2017, 12:30
- Forum: PCAN-UDS
- Topic: Fail to receive message from ECU with 29bit CAN addressing
- Replies: 18
- Views: 26824
Re: Fail to receive message from ECU with 29bit CAN addressi
Hi,
i had the same problem. After I set the the server address parameter to the address of my client application, i.e. 0xF9, i could remove the ISO-TP mappings and use the standard address protocol PUDS_PROTOCOL_ISO_15765_2_29B in the request.
I hope this helps you.
regards,
Martin Abel
i had the same problem. After I set the the server address parameter to the address of my client application, i.e. 0xF9, i could remove the ISO-TP mappings and use the standard address protocol PUDS_PROTOCOL_ISO_15765_2_29B in the request.
I hope this helps you.
regards,
Martin Abel
- Mon 25. Sep 2017, 12:24
- Forum: PCAN-UDS
- Topic: J1939 Address Claim
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4354
J1939 Address Claim
Hello,
we want to use the PCAN UDS Api in our applications to reduce development effort and support. The problem is that our UDS tester applications needs J1939 address claim support to discover dynamically the available ECUs on the bus. In our environment is only one PCAN USB dongle with one ...
we want to use the PCAN UDS Api in our applications to reduce development effort and support. The problem is that our UDS tester applications needs J1939 address claim support to discover dynamically the available ECUs on the bus. In our environment is only one PCAN USB dongle with one ...