Dear Sirs,
I am trying to use the Peak UDS driver to talk to a UDS LIN device behind a CAN-LIN bridge and I am confused on how to configure the PC driver. The LIN UDS ISO_15765 packet will have a NAD address as the first byte followed by the PCI in every 8-byte packet which is different than a ...
Search found 8 matches
- Wed 20. Sep 2023, 01:42
- Forum: PCAN-UDS
- Topic: Accessing LIN UDS Device behind Gateway
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1755
- Mon 22. Mar 2021, 23:04
- Forum: PCAN-ISO TP
- Topic: Issues with PEAK-ISO-API v3.1.1.227 with CAN-FD
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6317
Re: Issues with PEAK-ISO-API v3.1.1.227 with CAN-FD
The device driver version is
PCAN_USB 4.2.1.16433
(KMDF 1.9, x64, Desktop)
Copyright (C) 1995-2020 by
PEAK-System Technik GmbH, Darmstadt
We are not using the PCANBasic API. We are just using the PCAN-ISO TP API interface.
PCAN_USB 4.2.1.16433
(KMDF 1.9, x64, Desktop)
Copyright (C) 1995-2020 by
PEAK-System Technik GmbH, Darmstadt
We are not using the PCANBasic API. We are just using the PCAN-ISO TP API interface.
- Sun 15. Nov 2020, 18:29
- Forum: PCAN-ISO TP
- Topic: Follow Up to "Sending Basic Packet with Flow Control"
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6495
Re: Follow Up to "Sending Basic Packet with Flow Control"
The question I have is when will I get the LOOPBACK type of RX Events? After each Frame? Or just on the completion of the entire transfer? Now that I have the basics working I am trying to clean up my higher level SW architecture which is pretty basic right now.
- Fri 13. Nov 2020, 21:50
- Forum: PCAN-ISO TP
- Topic: Follow Up to "Sending Basic Packet with Flow Control"
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6495
Re: Follow Up to "Sending Basic Packet with Flow Control"
I think I may have this working now. Since I am new to this I did not understand the details of the spec or SW, did not understand I will always get this confirmation request after sending a command that needs to be cleared before I can read the response from the device I just queried with the ...
- Thu 12. Nov 2020, 02:17
- Forum: PCAN-ISO TP
- Topic: Follow Up to "Sending Basic Packet with Flow Control"
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6495
Re: Follow Up to "Sending Basic Packet with Flow Control"
After debugging, this also seems to have something to do with the event's always returning true after the first transmission. After that the call "WaitForSingleObject(receive_event, 1000);" always returns true.
- Wed 11. Nov 2020, 23:18
- Forum: PCAN-ISO TP
- Topic: Follow Up to "Sending Basic Packet with Flow Control"
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6495
Follow Up to "Sending Basic Packet with Flow Control"
I have a follow-up to Sending Basic Packet with Flow Control (https://forum.peak-system.com/viewtopic.php?f=181&t=6230).
I have been trying to actually test out my HW with this and I am running in to an issue that I did not notice before since I was not testing for it.
In my system I have an CAN ...
I have been trying to actually test out my HW with this and I am running in to an issue that I did not notice before since I was not testing for it.
In my system I have an CAN ...
- Tue 10. Nov 2020, 00:39
- Forum: PCAN-ISO TP
- Topic: Sending Basic Packet with Flow Control
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4596
Re: Sending Basic Packet with Flow Control
Thank you very much. I was able to get my first messages to go through with these changes.
- Wed 4. Nov 2020, 23:01
- Forum: PCAN-ISO TP
- Topic: Sending Basic Packet with Flow Control
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4596
Sending Basic Packet with Flow Control
I am trying to modify the example 02_client_ISO15765-2_normal_addressing to send a string of 8 bytes or longer. So I have the MSG to "PEAK1234" and the MSG_SIZE to 8. I also added a call to CANTP_SetValue_2016 to set the timing. On the bus I can see the data below and the first packet looks ok, I ...