It was already stated here that multiplexers inside multiplexers are currently not possible.
I'd really like to have the possibility of cascaded multiplexers. This would e.g. be handy in analyzing CANopen messages, where ...
- already the first byte provides info about type of message and then number of valid data bytes
- after type of message in the next bytes there is index and subindex
But I would not use this feature for CANopen only. In my development work I frequently whish that cascading multiplexers would be possible.
Best regards,
Christian Treffler